A Retrospective Cohort Study in patients over 55: Mechanical versus Biological valve prostheses

نویسندگان

  • M Tarazi
  • K Sivabalah
  • N Mayooran
  • R Neagu
  • B Philip
  • MN Anjum
  • K Doddakula
چکیده

Results Of the 138 patients, 59.8% (n = 61) of the patients with biological valves and 58.3% (n = 21) of the patients with mechanical survived between 5 to 10 years. The unpaired t-test and the chi-squared test performed showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the survival of patients who had biological valves and those who had mechanical valves. Discussion/Conclusion This study suggests that the type of valve prosthesis implanted does not affect the survival of the patients.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Double Full-Arch Versus Single Full-Arch, Four Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Retrospective, 5-Year Cohort Study.

PURPOSE To report the 5-year outcome of the All-on-4 treatment concept comparing double full-arch (G1) and single-arch (G2) groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study included 110 patients (68 women and 42 men, average age of 55.5 years) with 440 NobelSpeedy groovy implants. One hundred sixty-five full-arch, fixed, immediately loaded prostheses in both jaws were followed fo...

متن کامل

Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves.

OBJECTIVE To assess the benefit for patients older than 65 years of aortic valve replacement with stentless biological heart valves in comparison with mechanical valves. DESIGN Multiple regression analysis of a retrospective follow up study. SETTING Single cardiothoracic centre. PATIENTS Between 1996 and 2001, 392 patients with a mean age of 74 years underwent aortic valve replacement wit...

متن کامل

CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves

Objective: To assess the benefit for patients older than 65 years of aortic valve replacement with stentless biological heart valves in comparison with mechanical valves. Design: Multiple regression analysis of a retrospective follow up study. Setting: Single cardiothoracic centre. Patients: Between 1996 and 2001, 392 patients with a mean age of 74 years underwent aortic valve replacement with ...

متن کامل

On-X versus St Jude Medical Regent mechanical aortic valve prostheses: early haemodynamics

OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare the early haemodynamic data of the On-X and St Jude Medical (SJM) Regent bileaflet mechanical prostheses in the aortic position. METHODS A retrospective study was performed using data collected prospectively for a national database. Thirty-three patients who had aortic On-X valve (On-X group) and 33 matched patients who had aortic SJM Regent valve (SJM group) wer...

متن کامل

Very long-term survival implications of heart valve replacement with tissue versus mechanical prostheses in adults <60 years of age.

BACKGROUND Several centers favor replacing a diseased native heart valve with a tissue rather than a mechanical prosthesis, even in younger adult patients. However, long-term data supporting this approach are lacking. We examined the survival implications of selecting a tissue versus a mechanical prosthesis at initial left-heart valve replacement in a cohort of adults <60 years of age who were ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015